Insecticides

Immunosuppression by Neonicotinoids? - Infectious Diseases in US Bumblebees

We have been pondering on the significance of the laboratory evidence from Bee Researchers in France and the US that the administration of tiny amounts of a systemic neonicotinoid, imidacloprid, to bees was associated with a weakening of bee immunity, such that they became more susceptible to bee diseases. and decided to look more closely at the patterns of recent deaths/epidemics in the UK, Europe and the US, involving a variety of other wildlife. Massive declines in wild bumble bees in the US and Canada were reported in the late 1990s.

Immunosuppression by Neonicotinoids? - Infectious Diseases in Amphibians

We have been pondering on the significance of the laboratory evidence from Bee Researchers in France and the US that the administration of tiny amounts of a systemic neonicotinoid, imidacloprid, to bees was associated with a weakening of bee immunity, such that they became more susceptible to bee diseases. and decided to look more closely at the patterns of recent deaths/epidemics in the UK, Europe and the US, involving a variety of other wildlife. In 2006, in localised areas of the UK, the ranavirus caused infected frogs either to bleed to death or to develop skin ulceration [1]. By 2007, a similar condition was found in toads and laboratory experiments showed that transmission could occur by inoculation from an infected frog to a toad [2].

Immunosuppression by Neonicotinoids? - Infectious Diseases in Chaffinches

We have been pondering on the significance of the laboratory evidence from Bee Researchers in France and the US that the administration of tiny amounts of a systemic neonicotinoid, imidacloprid, to bees was associated with a weakening of bee immunity, such that they became more susceptible to bee diseases. and decided to look more closely at the patterns of recent deaths/epidemics in the UK, Europe and the US, involving a variety of other wildlife. In the UK, reports of chaffinches Fringilla coelebs appearing in gardens with white, crusty growths on their legs and feet caused by a papilloma virus began in 2005; the mortality is said to be about 20%, so the disease kills more slowly than with the greenfinch (Carduelis chloris) Trichomonas infections [1].

Immunosuppression by Neonicotinoids? - Infectious Diseases in Greenfinches

We have been pondering on the significance of the laboratory evidence from Bee Researchers in France and the US that the administration of tiny amounts of a systemic neonicotinoid, imidacloprid, to bees was associated with a weakening of bee immunity, such that they became more susceptible to bee diseases. and decided to look more closely at the patterns of recent deaths/epidemics in the UK, Europe and the US, involving a variety of other wildlife. In the UK, greenfinch deaths (maximum number of deaths in the months August to October) from infections with Trichomonas gallinae, a protozoal organism which invades the bird‟s crop and mucosal lining of the beak, started around 2005 and has devastated the populations throughout Europe [1].

Immunosuppression by Neonicotinoids? - White Nose Syndrome Fungus Disease in European Bats

We have been pondering on the significance of the laboratory evidence from Bee Researchers in France and the US that the administration of tiny amounts of a systemic neonicotinoid, imidacloprid, to bees was associated with a weakening of bee immunity, such that they became more susceptible to bee diseases. and decided to look more closely at the patterns of recent deaths/epidemics in the UK, Europe and the US, involving a variety of other wildlife. In March 2009 (published Feb 2010), Puechmaille et al. found the White-nose Syndrome Fungus (Geomyces destructans) on a single bat in a cave in France, but without other evidence of disease [1]. They raised the possibility that the fungus was not the primary cause of death “but acts as an opportunistic pathogen in bats already immune-compromised by other pathogens such as viruses or bacteria”.

Immunosuppression by Neonicotinoids? - White Nose Syndrome in Hibernating Bats in the US

We have been pondering on the significance of the laboratory evidence from Bee Researchers in France and the US that the administration of tiny amounts of a systemic neonicotinoid, imidacloprid, to bees was associated with a weakening of bee immunity, such that they became more susceptible to bee diseases. and decided to look more closely at the patterns of recent deaths/epidemics in the UK, Europe and the US, involving a variety of other wildlife. It was 2006 when White Nose Syndrome (WNS), a virulent and fatal fungus disease of hibernating bats, came to the attention of ecologists [1]. It was first found in a cave in New York State in the 2005/6 winter and rapidly spread through the north-eastern states. A powdery white nose tip was pathognomonic of the disease and when the powder was cultured a fungus, Geomyces destructans was grown. This infected the skin and wing membranes of bats and was associated with unprecedented numbers of deaths. It affected six different species of bat.

Regulators in Europe and the US decline to impose a ban on neonicotinoids

In the US the systemic neonicotinoids were introduced in 1991 and in the UK in 1994. The percentage of UK cropland treated with neonicotinoids has gone from 0.65% in 1994, to 24.4% in 2008. But the biggest increases have occurred in the last 10 years, from 1 million acres in 2000, to 2.5 million acres in 2008. We have collated a series of replies that we have personally received, or have seen, from the various Environmental Protection Agencies in Europe and the US. Uniformly, they all declined to impose a ban, because of „lack of evidence‟ that bees are being harmed. Attached is an article on the influence of Bayer Cropscience on Dutch policy makers (which appeared in the magazine "Vrij Nederland" on April 4, 2012).

Systemische Pestizide: Eine stille Gefahr

In seinem Buch "The systemic insecticides: a disaster in the making" klagt der Toxikologe Dr. Henk Tennekes Neonicotinoide als Bedrohung der Umwelt an. Er belegt, dass die systemischen neonicotinoiden Pestizid-Wirkstoffe aufgrund ihrer Wirkungsweise schon im Niedrigdosisbereich tödliche Folgen für eine Vielzahl von Insekten, Schnecken und Spinnen haben können und stellt den dramatischen Artenrückgang von Vögeln in Zusammenhang mit der steigenden Anwendung dieser Wirkstoffe in der Landwirtschaft.

De broedpopulatie van baardmannetjes is sterk gedaald sinds 1975 - oorzaak is waarschijnlijk het gebruik van bestrijdingsmiddelen

Toen in de loop van de jaren 1960 en 1970 in Flevoland enorme rietmoerassen ontstonden, explodeerde de populatie baardmannetjes Panurus biarmicus. Op het hoogtepunt in de periode 1973-1975 werd het aantal broedparen geschat op 7000. Daarna volgde een daling. Rond 2000 broedden er nog ongeveer 1200 tot 2000 paar in Nederland. Van de Nederlandse Baardmannetjes is ruim 85 % te vinden in drie kerngebieden: 1) Flevoland, met name de Oostvaardersplassen (65 %), 2) de buitendijkse moerasgebieden langs het IJsselmeer en de randmeren (12 %), 3) het Lauwersmeer (9 %). Volgens SOVON daalde in de periode 1990-2007 het aantal broedparen significant. Ook in Spanje, Zweden, Tsjechië, Oostenrijk en Moldavië daalde het broedbestand in de jaren 1990 (gegevens Birdlife International, zie bijlage). In de zomer bestaat het voedsel van baardmannetjes uit insecten en andere ongewervelden, in de winter uitsluitend uit zaden van riet.

Netzwerk will Bienensterben stoppen

Mit dem "Netzwerk blühendes Vorarlberg" will die Bodenseeakademie das Bienensterben stoppen, das in manchen Gebieten Vorarlbergs bis zu ein Drittel der Völker auslöscht. Die Aktion soll möglichst alle vom Bauern über Gemeinden bis hin zu Privatpersonen ins Boot holen. Ansatzpunkte sind bienengerechte Bepflanzungen und spätere Heuschnitte. Eine Hauptgefahr ist die sogenannte Maisbeitze, die auf die Saat aufgebracht wird und über das austretende Schwitzwasser die Bienen tötet, sagt eine Initiatoren des Netzwerks, Simone König. Das Netzwerk will darauf aufmerksam machen, dass es wieder mehr blühende Vielfalt in der Landschaft braucht. Sie fordern mehr blühende Streifen an den Wiesenrändern, dass Mähstreifen liegen gelassen werden sollten und außerdem eine stärkere Heckenbepflanzung. Zudem schlägt das Netzwerk vor, nicht alle Wiese zur selben Zeit zu mähen, damit die Insekten eine Rückzugsmöglichkeit haben.