Overige insecten

The long-term declines of invertebrates and birds on farmland

Invertebrates are an essential food source for most farmland birds. Dvac suction sampling was used to determine the abundance, biomass and community composition of those invertebrate groups considered important in the diet of farmland birds for the commonest arable crops. Approximately 40 fields were sampled at the edge and mid-field over 2 years in three different locations in England. In cereals, the fauna was primarily comprised of Araneae (10%), Coleoptera (30%) and Hemiptera (58%), whereas the oilseed rape fauna was dominated by Coleoptera (65%) and peas and potatoes by Hemiptera (89%). Beans contained a high proportion of Coleoptera (39%) and Hemiptera (49%). Aphididae were the most abundant family (20–86% of total), although in oilseed rape and beans, Chrysomelidae, Curculionidae and Nitidulidae formed ca 20% of the fauna. Aphids only formed a small proportion (7%) of the total biomass, except in peas (32%). Instead, Araneae, Carabidae, Heteroptera, Homoptera and Tipulidae formed much larger and more equal proportions. The highest abundance and biomass of invertebrates were recorded in cereals and least in potatoes. The Grey Partridge chick-food index in all crops was only a half or less of the level required to ensure that chick survival is sufficient to maintain numbers of this red-listed species.

Decline of malaria mosquito vectors in sub-Saharan Africa since 1998 despite the absence of organized vector control

In sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), malaria caused by Plasmodium falciparum has historically been a major contributor to morbidity and mortality. Recent reports indicate a pronounced decline in infection and disease rates. The decline has also occurred in areas with limited or no intervention. The present study assessed temporal changes in Anopheline populations in two highly malaria-endemic communities of NE Tanzania during the period 1998-2009. Between 1998 and 2001 (1st period) and between 2003 and 2009 (2nd period), mosquitoes were collected weekly in 50 households using CDC light traps. The average number of Anopheles gambiae and Anopheles funestus per trap decreased by 76.8% and 55.3%, respectively over the 1st period, and by 99.7% and 99.8% over the 2nd period. During the last year of sampling (2009), the use of 2368 traps produced a total of only 14 Anopheline mosquitoes. A longitudinal decline in the density of malaria mosquito vectors was seen during both study periods despite the absence of organized vector control.

Het daadwerkelijke risico van neonicotinoide insecticiden wordt schromelijk onderschat

De traditionele benadering van giftigheid is het testen in model organismen van dosis (concentratie) - effect verhoudingen bij een willekeurig vastgelegde blootstellingsduur, waarvan wordt verondersteld dat daarmee de 'acute' of 'chronische' blootstelling wordt nagebootst. Deze benadering meet het aandeel van alle blootgestelde individuen waarbij effecten worden waargenomen. Deze gegevens kunnen echter niet worden gerelateerd aan de zeer uiteenlopende blootstellingssituaties van mens en dier aan de vele potentieel giftige stoffen. In de bijgevoegde publicatie van Henk Tennekes en Francisco Sánchez-Bayo wordt aangetoond dat met de huidige toxicologische risicoanalyse het daadwerkelijke risico schromelijk kan worden onderschat. Voorbeelden daarvan zijn de giftigheid van neonicotinoide insecticiden en sommige zware metalen voor arthropoden (geleedpotigen). Hier zijn volledig nieuwe benaderingen vereist. Een toenemend aantal onderzoekers gebruikt nu een variant van het traditionele test protocol, waarbij de dosis (concentratie) wordt gekoppeld aan de tijd tot een bepaald effect (TTE) wordt waargenomen. Deze TTE benadering meet de effecten bij alle individuen, en verstrekt informatie over dosis (concentratie) en de blootstellingstijden die nodig zijn voor een giftige werking op de geteste organismen. Op die manier kunnen extrapolaties en voorspellingen worden gemaakt over de giftige gevolgen van iedere combinatie van dosis (concentratie) en blootstellingstijd.

Methods to eradicate wood-boring insects usually involve application of imidacloprid through direct trunk injection, soil injection. or soil drench

Between 1985 and 2005, at least 25 exotic species of wood borers were found to have become established in the United States. Due to the lack of both natural enemies and coevolved tree-resistance mechanisms to control these borers, these exotic species may become destructive and uncontrollable invasive tree pests. One example is the European woodwasp, Sirex noctilio (Hymenoptera: Siricidae), which has become a serious pest in each country to which it has been introduced. Another example is the emerald ash borer, Agrilus planipennis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae), discovered in North America in 2002. Methods to control or eradicate wood-boring insects are still being developed, but the newest methods usually involve application of systemic insecticides, such as imidacloprid through direct trunk injection, soil injection, or soil drench. This chemical moves within trees to reach cryptic larvae as well as affecting adults of some species that feed externally. The desired level of control, however, is seldom achieved by this approach due to unpredictable translocation of insecticides within trees and asynchronous larval development, both of which allow many insects to evade treatment. Moreover, chemical insecticides are usually broadly toxic, resulting in risks to non-target organisms and potential groundwater contamination. Many chemical insecticides and formulations require handling by licensed applicators resulting in prohibitive costs.

Imidacloprid is used in the United States to eradicate the Asian longhorned beetle

The Asian longhorned beetle’s (ALB) recent introduction to the United States is a serious threat to hardwood trees. This beetle has no known natural predator in the United States and the potential to cause more damage than Dutch elm disease, chestnut blight, and gypsy moths combined, destroying millions of acres of America’s treasured hardwoods, including national forests and backyard trees. Recently the insecticide Imidacloprid has presented good results in field applications and is increasingly being used in conjunction with other methods to protect trees and eradicate the pest. The citrus longhorned beetle (CLB), a very close relative of ALB, is a severe pest of citrus, but it also attacks most of the same tree species attacked by ALB. Unlike ALB, however, CLB typically attacks its host in the lower 0.5 metres of the trunk, around the root collar and on exposed roots. Therefore, CLB quickly girdles and kills its hosts. While CLB is also native to Asia (e.g. China, Japan), it has been intercepted twice in the USA (once on bonsai) and in a number of locations in Europe. More alarming are the new CLB infestations found in the Netherlands in 2007 and in Germany in 2008. Furthermore, the first CLB infestation found in Europe, specifically in northern Italy, has continued to expand in the past few years.

Controlling the pine weevil, the most important pest of replanted coniferous sites in Europe

The large pine weevil, Hylobius abietis, is the most important pest of replanted coniferous sites in Ireland and throughout northern Europe. If left unchecked, it can kill every young tree on a site. the normal method to control weevils is to use chemicals, but another approach being developed uses more natural methods. Pine weevil is the only forest pest against which chemical insecticide is routinely applied in Ireland and there is a real need to develop an ecologically sustainable management strategy for it. The weevils develop in the stumps of recently cut conifers and emerge as adults which attack newly planted trees, both conifer and broadleaf. Weevils feeding on the bark can kill a young tree within days. The traditional approach is to treat each seedling with insecticide.

Imidacloprid is highly effective against the red palm weevil, the major pest of palms in the Mediterranean Basin

The invasive red palm weevil, Rhynchophorus ferrugineus (Olivier), has become the major pest of palms in the Mediterranean Basin. Chemical control against this species is difficult because of its cryptic habits and is mainly based on the repeated application of large quantities of synthetic insecticides. The aim of this work has been to evaluate in the field the efficacy of imidacloprid (Confidor® 240 OD) and Steinernema carpocapsae Weiser with chitosan (Biorend R® Palmeras) as soil and stipe treatments respectively, alone or in combination, against this pest. All treatments significantly reduced the mean number of immature stages of R. ferrugineus per palm. However, there were no significant differences among the different treatments considered. Efficacies ranged from 83.8 to 99.7% for the mean number of immature stages found in the palms and resulted in a significant increase in palm survival compared with the untreated control (75.0–90.0% versus 16.5% respectively). Both imidacloprid and S. carpocapsae in a chitosan formulation proved highly effective against R. ferrugineus in the field, and their efficacies did not significantly change when used in combination.

Systemic Insecticides Recommended to Control Regeneration Pests of Loblolly Pine in the United States

Loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) covers 16 million ha of forestland in the southeastern United States, more than half of which consists of plantations. Regeneration pests of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) threaten growth and survival in intensively managed loblolly pine plantations throughout the southeastern United States. The Nantucket pine tip moth, Rhyacionia frustrana (Comstock), in particular, often reduces growth of loblolly pine but has been difficult to control with traditional insecticides due to multiple annual generations and multi-year infestations which are difficult to predict in timing and location. Relatively new systemic insecticide products offer a solution in that their efficacy persists through multiple generations and years after a single application. Efficacy of systemic imidacloprid and fipronil were evaluated side by side across multiple sites in Virginia. Significant reductions in Nantucket pine tip moth damage were noted in trees treated with either the imidacloprid or fipronil product compared with check trees. After 2 yr, growth improvement of treated trees relative to controls was modest and not signiÞcant at all sites, but per acre volume indices were significantly greater in treated blocks as a result of higher tree survival. Reduced seedling mortality was attributed primarily to prevention of damage by pales weevil, Hylobius pales Herbst (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), by both insecticide treatments. Control of pales weevil in addition to pine tip moth suggests that systemic insecticide products with a long window of efficacy might control additional nontargeted pests.

With global value of $980 million in 2008, imidacloprid provides insect control for crops and noncrops

Imidacloprid, developed by Bayer CropScience in 1985, is an insecticide, a seed treatment insecticide and seed treatment insecticide/fungicide combination. Bayer still holds patents on the active for some formulations, specifically when combined with fertilizer. Its mode of action is nicotine acetylcholine receptor agonist/antagonist, and it is registered in more than 100 countries worldwide for use on more than 140 crops. It is used primarily on canola, cereals, corn, cotton, oil seed rape, pastures, potatoes, rice, sorghum, sugarbeet and sunflowers for approved control of aphids, fruit flies, leafhoppers, grubs, termites, thrips, white fly, wireworms, various beetles (including flea beetle and pygmy beetle), various weevils, nematodes and various fungal diseases. It also has widespread applications in noncrop, including nursery, landscape, forestry, pest control and veterinary applications. Bayer Animal Health has been using a 10% imidacloprid formulation for its popular Advantage/Advantix flea treatments for dogs and cats as early as 1986.

Current toxicological risk assessment can lead to serious underestimates of actual risk - neonicotinoids are a case in point

The traditional approach to toxicity testing is to consider dose (concentration)-effect relationships at arbitrarily fixed exposure durations which are supposed to reflect ‘acute’ or ‘chronic’ time scales. This approach measures the proportion of all exposed individuals responding by the end of different exposure times. Toxicological databases established in this way are collections of endpoint values obtained at fixed times of exposure. As such these values cannot be linked to make predictions for the wide range of exposures encountered by humans or in the environment. Thus, current toxicological risk assessment can be compromised by this approach to toxicity testing, as will be demonstrated in this paper, leading to serious underestimates of actual risk. This includes neonicotinoid insecticides and certain metallic compounds, which may require entirely new approaches. In order to overcome this handicap, an increasing number of researchers are using a variant of the traditional toxicity testing protocol which includes time to event (TTE) methods. This TTE approach measures the times to respond for all individuals, and provides information on the acquired doses as well as the exposure times needed for a toxic compound to produce any level of effect on the organisms tested. Consequently, extrapolations and predictions of toxic effects for any combination of concentration and time are now made possible.